When given a job to move an
enormously heavy load, one would think to move it with circular wheels. The
axels on the wheels would buckle under pressure. The object should instead be
placed on a platform with cylindrical rollers. The rollers would have to be
picked up and placed in front of the object to keep it rolling. These rollers
have what is called a constant width to keep the object from bouncing up and
down.
Most people think that the only
shape that has a constant width is a circle. This is a common mistake. There is
actually infinity of curves that have a constant width. The simplest of these
curves is the Reuleaux triangle. To construct a Reuleaux triangle, first draw
and equilateral triangle with sides A, B, and C. Then with a compass draw and
arc from A to B, B to C, and C to A. If two parallel lines forming a right
angle limit a curve of constant width, such as the Reuleaux triangle, the
bounding lines will form a square. If a Reuleaux triangle is placed within a
square and rotated, this will be observed. In 1914 Harry James Watts took this
into consideration and created a drill based on the Reuleaux triangle. This
drill drilled square holes! The drill is simply a Reuleaux triangle made
concave in three spots to allow for cutting. The Reuleaux triangle has the
smallest area for the given width out of all the curves. The corners have
angles of 120 degrees, which are the sharpest possible angles that a curve of
constant width can obtain. Extending the sides of the equilateral triangle can
round off these corners. This provides you with points D, E, F, G, H, and
I. Use a compass to first connect D to
I, E to F, and G to H. Then use the compass to connect the letters that have
already not been connected. This makes it a symmetrical curve of constant
width. This process of can also be done with a regular pentagon.
It is possible to have
unsymmetrical curves of constant width. One example is to start with a star of
seven points. Draw line segments connecting each point to the point almost
directly across from it. All of the line segments need to be mutually intersecting.
Each of these line segments must be of equal length. Use a compass to connect
the two opposite corners to form an arc. This will result in a curve of
constant width.
A curve of constant with does not
need to be made up of circular arcs. You can draw a convex curve from the top
to the bottom of a square and touching its left side. This curve will determine
a curve of constant width. This being said, the curve cannot include straight
lines. The perimeters of all curves of constant width n have the same length.
Since a circle is a curve of a constant width, the perimeter of any curve with
a constant width of n must be pi n. This is the same as the circumference of a
circle with a diameter of n.
Most people would assume that a
sphere is the only solid on constant width. This is not true. There are many
solids that when rotated inside a cube, the shape is touching all six sides of
the cube. All solids with constant width are derived from the regular
tetrahedron. It is a very common mistake to think that all solids of constant
widths have the same surface area. This is definitely not the case. Contrary to
this, all the shadows of solids with constant widths are curves of a constant
width. In 1917 Sôichi
Kakeya proposed the Kakeya needle problem. The problem is: What is the plane
figure of least area in which a line segment of length 1 can be rotated 360
degrees? For a long time, many mathematicians believed that the answer to this
problem was the deltoid. Ten years later Abram Samoilovitch Besicovitch, Russian
mathematician, proved that this problem had no answer. He proved that there is
no minimum area.
This chapter was very interesting to me. Prior to
reading it I believed that circles were the only shapes with constant widths.
To learn that there is infinity of shapes with constant width was really an eye
opener. This chapter was sometimes hard to follow and I had to reread many
sections more than once but in the end it was worth it.
I thought this chapter was slightly confusing but interesting too. I also thought it was shocking how there is infinity of shapes with constant width. Great summary.
ReplyDeleteYou did a good job explaining a very confusing chapter! I learned a lot about shapes with constant widths.
ReplyDeleteYeah I thought the material presented was a little complex at times, but your blog brought up some nice key points in the chapter! Knowing that there are an infinite amount of shapes with constant widths is pretty amazing.
ReplyDeleteIt was really cool to read about the fact that there are an infinity of shapes with the constant widths. I also liked the star example that you provided. Your summary helped me understand more about the constant widths.
ReplyDeleteGreat job summarizing the chapter, it was a difficult read. This helped me understand the read a lot better. Good job!
ReplyDelete