The
four-color theorem is a simple mathematical puzzle that was solved in the
1800’s by a mathematician named Willie Guthrie. “The four-color theorem states
that any map in a plane can be colored using four-colors in such a way that regions
sharing a common boundary (other than a single point) do not share the same
color” (Weisstein). Guthrie discovered this when he noticed that four colors
suffice a map of England. The
Apple-Haken proof, developed in the 1970’s, needs a computer to solve it and
mathematicians say that even though the hand written part of the proof is
possible, it is extremely difficult and would take a very long time. Another
mathematician named Heesch later developed the two main parts needed to write
the ultimate proof, reducibility and discharging. Reducibility is an algorithm
that transforms an equation into another equation, which can be seen in Euler’s
formula I mention later. Discharging proves lemmas in structural graph theory.
In the four-color theorem, discharging divides the already graph into smaller
graphs from a specified list. I believe to understand this theorem is with an
example like the one below.
Even with
this theorem being seemingly impossible to disprove with all the different
shapes and maps, some mathematicians still found ways to prove this theorem
wrong. Soon after Guthrie developed this theorem a man named Heawood proved
another mathematician by the name Kempe wrong by using a map with eighteen
faces. Although the theorem was proven back in the 1800’s people today still
try and solve it in different ways with different planes, maps and less colors
and anything in between. Appel and Haken’s proof that I mentioned in the first
in the first paragraph used computers to solve try and prove their proof. “Although
we could not guarantee that our work would lead to a proof of the four-color
theorem. We were given well over 1,000 hours of computer time in what we feel
was an admirable display of faith in the value -of pure mathematical
research” (Appel). In the 1970’s Kenneth Appel researched the four-color
theorem like no one had before by using over 1,000 hours of computer research
to find and alter the math of the theorem to prove it in many different ways.
The math used to find figures that use the minimal amount of space, degrees and
shapes to solve this theorem are beyond any of our levels but I will show you
two examples that challenge this theorem.
These figures were
developed with very precise angels and vertices that follow very strict rules.
These strict rules are the rules of discharging, which I mentioned in the
previous paragraph. Each vertex of the graph, which makes up the maps and
graphs, has a charge. These charges are what helps mathematicians develop
algorithms that deal with planar graphs. Even with all of these rules the
theorem still is successful. Over the years mathematicians have developed
shapes with many vertices that actually need more than four colors.
Euler’s formula was
used for to solve the countries map problem with the four-color theorem. The formula
f + v – e = 2 may seem simple and it
is in ways but this was the basis formula for this theorem. An example that
shows how to use Euler’s formula can be seen below. The v stands for the vertices, the e
represents the edges shared by two regions and the f represents the faces or regions.
Now there are too
many formulas for this theorem to give you one and say this is how you solve
everything. Today’s formula use a different suffix g depending on the number of the colors you want to use to fill in
the map. For example you can use six colors to suffice g= 0 and also five colors but once you try to solve for four colors
is when it becomes extremely difficult. Simply going down to from five to four
colors is what makes this “simple” theorem more complex than just filling in
states with four colors.
When talking about
the four-color theorem there is something special about it that most might
forget to talk about. The four-color theorem not only applies to finite planar
graphs but also infinite graphs. This was discovered when a mathematician
combined a finite graph theorem with De Bruijn-Erdos theorem. This theorem
states that every finite graph is an infinite graph k-colorable. With this theorem, the four-color theorem became the
ultimate theorem for coloring any shape, map or graph.
Appel,
Kenneth; Haken, Wolfgang (October 1977), Solution of the Four Color Map
Problem, Scientific American 237 (4): 108–121
Weisstein, Eric W. "Four-Color Theorem." From Math World--A Wolfram Web Resource. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Four-ColorTheorem.html
Weisstein, Eric W. "Four-Color Theorem." From Math World--A Wolfram Web Resource. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Four-ColorTheorem.html
I like how this theorem can be applied to real world topics like map coloring. I didn't think much of it that one can use four colors in a structure and not have any same color touch each other, but obviously it requires a lot work. A question tat I still have though is what discharge is? I don't understand what it has to do with this theorem and how it is applied. However, what I thought was pretty interesting is that people are still trying to figure out different ways to solve this problem.
ReplyDeleteThe description of this four color theorem is very cool to read about. It's interesting that none of the four colors touch the same colors. After reading about that, it made me want to do more research into this because it does seem like the same colors would touch somewhere. The part about Euler's formula being used to solve the countries map problem with the four color theorem amazed me because I never knew that this theorem needed any technical solving let alone solving for the number of colors to fill a map.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteI found it interesting how four colors can be applied to coloring a map in a way that none of them are the same when side by side or downward nor upward. What I found more fascinating was that there is an equation that can solve the map color problem. I have heard of this theorem but I haven't tried to color a map in this way. Good summary though.
ReplyDeleteI have never heard of this theorem. Your summary explained it well and I think its crazy that this is even possible. I definitely have to urge to print out a non-colored copy of this pattern and try it myself!
ReplyDeleteI found this very interesting since my Theorem had this essential idea of boundary regions not having the same color. Yet in my research that I had done did not go into details about the boundary regions not having the same color. And having some knowledge before reading this made this topic much more interesting.
ReplyDeleteI have heard of this before, but I never actually tried to do it myself with the map of the United States. It's crazy to think how even with all these rules, the theorem can still be proven though it gets rather complicated with the colors example as four colors would be harder as opposed to six or seven. Someone would have to see it to believe it to understand it and you did a good job explaining how it works with the images.
ReplyDeleteThis is not the first time I have heard of this theorem. I have actually tried to apply this theorem on a map of the United States and I couldn't figure it out. It is an easy concept to understand, but not an easy concept to apply. If you haven't tried to put this theorem on paper, I suggest you should and see if you can do it.
ReplyDeleteThis is an interesting topic. Never heard about it until you brought it to my attention. I always thought the colors of the countries on the world map are just randomly put. I'm just wondering, are there general (or specific if there) factors that dictate the limitation of colors on a shape, or regions to be colored?
ReplyDeletethe four color theorem is an interesting concept. i am thankful for my level of math classes that i am taking because they help me, slightly, to understand the math behind this theorem. it is crazy tot think that 4 colors can map out any sections or pieces of a puzzle without touching 2 of the same color.
ReplyDeleteThis was very interesting, I've never heard about it but it grabbed my attention. It would be cool to try it out for myself, I may have to do so.
ReplyDeleteI'm always baffled by stuff like this because someone just sat down and did this kind of math. I think that the simplest of things have such complicated math behind them. It really makes you appreciate the simplest of things (at least for nerds like me). I found it interesting that the equation was just three variables though.
ReplyDeleteWhat grabbed my attention was that puzzle right away.The four color theorem was very cool to read. I didn't have to read this twice so that was nice also. I found it interesting how just something as this four color theorem would have an equation behind it. Overall I thought this blog was very interesting to read about.
ReplyDeleteI have never heard of this theorem before. I liked that you explained how this topic can be applied to real examples such as coloring a map. It was interesting to know none of the four colors on the map would touch. I also liked your pictures.
ReplyDeleteThis theorem was introduced to me before, and I find it very interesting. The way you explained it was really comprehensive, and I don't think that anything you said was confusing at all. The pictures provided really added to the post, and helped with the understanding of the topic.
ReplyDelete