Non-Euclidean
geometry consists of two geometries created on axioms. It is a system of
definitions, proofs, and rules that define the points, lines, and its planes. Two of the non-Euclidean geometries are
spherical and hyperbolic geometry. The
difference is in their parallel lines. In
the Euclidean geometry, there is only one line through the point that is in the
same line and never intersects. In spherical
geometry, there are no lines, and in hyperbolic geometry there are at least two
different lines that pass through the point.
This topic of non-Euclidean geometry has been a controversy for
many mathematicians for almost 2,000 years, which is to be able to remove the
postulate by making it a theorem. For example, in the book “The Colossal Book
of Mathematics”, there were many obsessions over this problem. Farkas Bolyai’s
son, Janos became obsessed with this problem and did not give up until he could
solve it.
Resulting later on, he
convinced himself that not only the postulate was independent from the axioms,
but there was also consistent geometry that through a point, an infinite number
of lines are parallel to that. It was Gauss, the Prince of Mathematicians and a
really close friend of Janos, who actually created the term “non-Euclidean
geometry”, which is now known as hyperbolic geometry.
In the book “Euclidean and Non-Euclidean Geometries”, Marvin
Jay Greenberg states that “according to Euclid, two lines in a plane either
meet or are parallel. There is no other possible relation.” Gauss pointed out
the error that was wrong in Janos’ discovery.
Even though Janos had discovered most of the non-Euclidean research,
Gauss was seen as the mathematician to receive credit.
According to D.M.Y. Sommerville’s book of “The Elements of
Non-Euclidean Geometry,” Non-Euclidean geometry consists of infinite areas,
from Bertrand’s proof. The misconception
is when applying the principle of superposition to an infinite of areas.
This chapter really had me thinking, compared to the other
blogs I have worked on and read. I had
never heard of Non-Euclidean geometry until working on this section. I found it interesting on how many
mathematicians did not put much attention to this kind of geometry because for
2,000 years, no one had enough research and results. Still at this point, I
stay in the middle of fully understanding this chapter, but that is why I continue
to read on the topic.
I found this chapter to be really interesting. It was cool to read that both of the non-euclidean geometries are differently shaped based on the parallel line which distinguishes the difference and in the euclidean geometry its just one same line.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Gaby, it was really cool to read about different types of geometric stand points. It's funny how Euclid didn't bother to provide a proof because he believed it was too simple.
ReplyDeleteThis chapter was good but for me it was a chapter that I needed more information to understand it and I thought your summary was good and helped me understand more.
ReplyDeleteI also have not heard of this type of geometry, but was totally fascinated by it. I'm hoping to go more in depth into this topic one day.
ReplyDeletei liked this chapter very much. i am a fan of geometry and all shapes and styles of the field. upon reading this chapter i was prompted to learn more about it and i realized that almost all shapes are slices from cones and cones are now my favorite shape. aside from that i thought you did a swell job.
ReplyDelete